|
The Notice of Solicitations of Applications (NOSA)
for the 2009 VAPG
program was released May 6 then subsequently
retracted. The revised NOSA was released September 1, 2009; a
subsequent modification to the allowed project start date was issued on
October 5.
The significant changes in the revised and modified NOSA include:
-
Applications were due Monday, November 30, 2009.
-
Projects cannot begin earlier than June 1, 2010 or later than November
30, 2010. Projects cannot end later than November 30, 2013.
-
The
new provision in the original 2009 NOSA requiring applicants to list all
of their owners/members by name, with the percentage of
ownership/membership of each, was not changed. Also unchanged is the
requirement to list the owners of all owners/members that are not
individuals (e.g., a partnership, S corporation, or LLC that is a member
of a cooperative or trade association).
-
The
new provision in the original 2009 NOSA disqualifying in-kind time by
applicants as a match for planning grants was not changed, nor was other
“conflict” language that may impact the eligibility of certain cash and
in-kind matches.
-
“Innovation” as a separate evaluation/scoring criteria has been deleted.
-
The
terms “Project” and “Pro Forma Financial Statement” are now included in
the definitions. This is not earthshaking, however these terms have
long been used in the VAPG NOSAs but the definition has been left open.
-
More points have been allocated to beginning small and medium sized,
socially disadvantaged farmers/ranchers.
-
More points have been allocated to those making smaller requests.
-
New
language states “Applications that propose only branding, packaging, or
other similar means of product differentiation are not eligible …
however, applications may propose branding, packaging, or other product
differentiation activities as a component of a value-added strategy for
products otherwise eligible ...”. We have seen few projects in the past
that fit this description, but there have been notable exceptions.
-
As in
the past, applicants may submit drafts of their applications to their
State Offices for a preliminary review (anytime prior to November 2,
2009). The preliminary review will only assess the eligibility of the
application and its completeness. The results of the preliminary review
are not binding on USDA.
Click here
for the official full revised 2009 VAPG NOSA.
There have been significant changes compared to recent years;
please see the summary and the link to the official NOSA below. The total amount available will be $18 million, about the same as
2008. Like last year, the maximum award for working capital
projects will be $300,000 and the maximum for planning grants will be
$100,000.
Serious applicants should assess their
proposed
projects as soon as possible. This program is typically very
competitive; 6 of the 23 applications submitted in California in 2008
were successful. Morrison & Company wrote half of these successful
proposals.
Morrison
& Company has been blessed
with a record of 34 of 37 full grant proposals since its founding in 2002; we can help with a
preliminary assessment of your project at no charge. For more on
our grant services, please click here.
The 2009 regulations are summarized for
your convenience below; click here
for the official full revised 2009 VAPG NOSA:
*****
SUMMARY OF 2009 VAPG REGULATIONS:
Regulations at a
glance
Changes from last year
Purpose of the
VAPG program
Due dates
What are value-added agricultural
products?
Planning grants
Working capital
grants
Eligible
uses
Ineligible
uses
Eligible
applicants
"Reserved" and "unreserved" funds
Matching funds
Evaluation
process
Where can I find the official NOSA (rules) and
application guidance?
I have more questions
Regulations
at a glance
1.
Grant and matching funds
must be used to promote value-added agricultural products, primarily for
the benefit of agricultural producers.
2. “Value-added agricultural
products” are described below.
3. Eligible applicants are described
below.
3.
Grant and matching funds
may be used for domestic or international projects.
4.
Grant and matching funds
may be used for planning projects or
working capital projects, but not
both in the same year's program.
5.
Projects must last no more than 36 months, begin no sooner
than June 1, 2009.
6. Grant awards are expected to be announced by May 3, 2010.
Back
Changes from last year
Some of the
more notable changes from last year include:
-
The 2009 NOSA creates reserved and unreserved funds,
to which 20 percent and 80 percent of total funding will be allocated,
respectively.
-
Biofuels for non-farm use or sale are considered value-added products
for the first time since the 2005 program.
-
Projects may now be completed within 36 months instead of one year.
-
Local and Regional Supply Networks
have been created as an applicant type.
-
Match and grant funds must be expended proportionate to their respective
totals; previously match funds had only to be spent at least at the same
rate (in dollars) as grant funds.
-
The page limit for the proposal narrative has been reduced from 35 pages
to 15.
-
There are reduced application requirements for applications seeking less
than $50,000.
-
Fifteen
additional points (out of a total of 90) are awarded to applicants that
are a Beginning Farmer or Rancher, a Socially Disadvantaged Farmer or
Rancher, or an operator of a Small (<$250,000 average annual revenues)
or Medium-Sized (<$750,000 average annual revenues) Farm or Ranch that
is structured as a Family Farm.
Back
Purpose of the VAPG
program
The purpose of the VAPG program is to
enable producers of agricultural commodities to participate in the
economic returns from “Value-Added Agricultural Products,” which are
agricultural commodities or products that have been changed, produced,
or segregated in such a way as to increase their market value. Grants may be used to:
·
Develop business plans
and strategies for creating marketing opportunities, market studies, and feasibility
studies (Planning Grants)
·
Provide capital to
establish business ventures that allow the producers of the
value-added agricultural product to better compete (Working
Capital Grants).
Projects may be in domestic or
international markets, or both.
Back
Due
Dates
Applications
must be postmarked or
electronically filed by November 30,2009.
State USDA Rural Development offices can
do a non-binding review for eligibility only
of applications submitted for that purpose by November 2, 2009.
Back
What
are value-added agricultural products?
Any
agricultural commodity or product that:
·
Has undergone
a change in physical state (e.g., juice, salsa, bread, bio-diesel), or
·
Was produced
in a manner that enhances the value of the agricultural commodity or
product, as demonstrated through a Business Plan that shows the enhanced
value (e.g., organic products), or
·
Is physically
segregated in a manner that results in the enhancement of the value of the
Agricultural Commodity or product (e.g., non-GMO), or
·
Is a source
of farm- or ranch-based renewable energy, including E–85 fuel, or
·
Is aggregated
and marketed as a locally-produced agricultural food product (generally,
sold within 400 miles of the farm or ranch)
AND
·
The customer
base for the agricultural commodity or product is expanded, and
·
A greater
portion of the revenue derived from the marketing, processing, or physical
segregation of the agricultural commodity or product is available to the
producer of the commodity or product.
In addition,
the 2009 NOSA creates "Mid-Tier Value
Chain Projects." Mid-tier value chain projects must involve "Local
and Regional Supply Networks" that contain at least two alliances,
linkages, or partnerships within the value chain. They must also directly
impact the profitability and competitiveness of Small and Medium- Sized
Farms and Ranches that are structured as Family Farms. Finally, the project
must include an agreement from an Agricultural Producer Group, Farmer or
Rancher Cooperative, or Majority- Controlled Producer-Based Business Venture
that is engaged in the value chain on a marketing strategy.
Back
Planning grants
These are grants to facilitate the
development of a defined program of economic activities to determine the
viability of a potential value-added venture such as feasibility
studies, marketing strategies, business plans, and legal evaluations.
Planning
grant funds may
be used to develop a business plan or perform a feasibility study to
establish a viable marketing opportunity for a value-added producer. These uses include, but are not limited to:
·
Obtain
legal advice and assistance related to the proposed venture;
·
Conduct a feasibility analysis of a proposed value-added venture to help
determine the potential for marketing success;
·
Develop a business plan that provides comprehensive details on the
management, planning, and other operational aspects of a proposed
venture;
·
Develop a marketing plan for the proposed value-added product, including
the identification of a market window, the identification of potential
buyers, a description of the distribution system, and possible
promotional campaigns.
Back
Working capital
grants
These grants provide funds to operate
ventures and pay normal expenses that are eligible uses of grant funds. Working Capital Grant
funds may be used to provide capital to establish business
ventures that allow the producer of the value-added agricultural product
to better compete in domestic or international markets. These uses
include, but are not limited to:
·
Design
or purchase an accounting system for the proposed venture;
·
Pay
for salaries, utilities, and rental of office space;
·
Purchase inventory, office equipment (e.g. computers, printers,
copiers, scanners), and office supplies (e.g. paper, pens, file
folders)
·
Conduct a marketing campaign for the proposed value-added product.
Applicants for working capital grants must have a feasibility study
prepared by
an independent consultant and a business plan prior to submitting the
application. If this affects you
and/or you do not currently have an independently prepared feasibility
study or a business plan, contact
Morrison & Company. With CPAs on staff, we can do this as
part of our integrated services in a timely, cost effective manner.
Back
Eligible uses
1.
An application may be for
either a Planning Grant or a Working Capital Grant, but not both.
2.
Grant funds may be used to
pay up to 50 percent of the costs for carrying out relevant projects.
Matching funds must provide for the balance of costs.
3.
Matching funds may only be
used for the same purposes allowed for grant funds.
Back
Ineligible
uses
Grant and matching funds may not be used
to:
1.
Plan, repair,
rehabilitate, acquire, or construct a building or facility, including a
processing facility.
2.
Purchase, rent, or install
fixed equipment, including processing equipment.
3.
Purchase vehicles,
including boats.
4.
Pay for the preparation of
the grant application.
5.
Pay expenses not directly
related to the funded venture.
6.
Fund political or lobbying
activities.
7.
Fund any activities
prohibited by 7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019.
8.
Fund architectural or
engineering design work for a specific physical facility.
9.
Fund any expenses related
to the production of any commodity or product to which value will be
added, including seed, rootstock, labor for harvesting the crop, and
delivery of the commodity to a processing facility.
10.
Fund research and
development.
11.
Purchase land.
Back
Eligible
applicants
Grants will
be awarded to :
·
Independent
producers (includes agricultural producers, steering committees of producers
who have not yet formed a formal business entity, and producer owned
corporations and associations)
·
Eligible
agricultural producer groups (e.g., trade associations)
·
Farmer or
rancher cooperatives
·
Majority-controlled producer-based business ventures.
·
Local
and regional supply networks. This is a
new category for 2009. The applicant must be either one of the
organizations that is a member of the network who agrees to be the legal
representative for the network and assume responsibility for the management
of grant funds, if selected for funding, or the applicant must be a legal
entity that is comprised of the business enterprises that are members of the
network. May only apply for "mid-tier value-chain
projects."
Back
"Reserved" and "unreserved" funds
This is new
for 2009. Ten percent of available funds are reserved to fund applications
submitted by “Beginning Farmers or Ranchers” and “Socially Disadvantaged
Farmers or Ranchers.” An additional ten percent of available funds are
reserved to fund “Mid-Tier Value Chain projects.” Collectively, this these
two types are referred to as ‘‘reserved funds.’’
Back
Matching funds
Grant recipients must provide matching
non-Federal funds at least equal to the amount of the grant received. These
matching funds must be spent in the same ratio that they are provided
(e.g., 1 to 1). Matching funds can be cash, "in-kind" non-cash
contributions, or a combination of both. Matching funds may also
be provided by third parties. If you think meeting the matching
fund requirement would be difficult for you, contact Morrison
& Company for possible strategies.
Back
Evaluation
process
USDA will conduct an initial screening
of all submitted proposals to determine whether the applicant is eligible and
whether the application is complete and sufficiently responsive to the
requirements set forth in the NOSA. Applications that pass the screening will be evaluated by other technical experts appointed by USDA. The
Administrator reserves the right to award additional points, as
specified in the NOSA, to accomplish agency objectives. State
offices can do a non-binding review for eligibility only
of applications submitted for that purpose by November 2, 2009.
Back
Where can I find the official NOSA (rules) and
application guidance?
The 2009 NOSA is
available here in a
PDF file as a
convenience.
Click here for the
USDA's official website and links.
Back
I have more questions
For a no-cost preliminary assessment, to learn
more about our services, or to request
information on grant programs, call Brent Morrison at 530 893-4764, ext.
202 or email
bmorrison@morrisonco.net.
The grant process and the related governmental regulations can be
complex. The VAPG program offers great rewards but the process is highly competitive.
All proposed projects have their
strengths and weaknesses, as do the applying entities. Our
expertise is in helping our clients achieve every scoring point
possible, highlighting strengths, and overcoming negatives as best
possible.
Back
|